Here’s something I thought was interesting that I recently heard. Did you know that in some states you have to have permit to carry or buy a Taser Stun Gun, or Mace, but you do not need a permit to buy a gun. That just sounds bizarre. Don’t get me wrong, I am all for guns and the right to bear arms. However, I am not allowed to have them in the house, because that is the one fight with the wife that I can not win. But I digress.

I just does not seem logical to allow some one to buy a lethal weapon such as a pistol or shotgun with out a permit, but they must have permit to buy something like mace? Let’s be honest, I think most people who buy guns “for protection” are really buying them so they have the chance to kill some one who desperately needs to be killed. If some jackass gets around your home security system and breaks into your home, you should be allowed to use as much force as you want to protect yourself. You’ve got to assume if someone is in your house without your permission, they mean to harm you. Especially in this day and age. If someone is carrying mace, pepper spray, or a stun gun, I do not think they have killing someone in mind. I would think the State would rather a person stun or mace someone, than kill them. What’s the worst that can happen to someone getting maced, a little eye damage? Too bad, you should not have been attacking some chick in a parking lot. A little high voltage shock? Again, you get what you asked for. But double-tapping someone with your Glock 9, while warranted, might not be necessary. What is the message here? Kill, Kill, Kill.